https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184557 The Supreme Court held that the termination of the respondent, a temporary employee, was lawful as per the U.P. Temporary Government Servant (Termination of Services) Rules, 1975 and the terms of the contract. The Court clarified that the termination was not discriminatory as retaining juniors did not violate constitutional provisions. Additionally, the termination was found to be based on work and suitability, not punitive in nature, and did not violate Article 311 of the Constitution. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and dismissed the respondent's writ petition. en-us Fri, 11 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:23:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184557 The Supreme Court held that the termination of the respondent, a temporary employee, was lawful as per the U.P. Temporary Government Servant (Termination of Services) Rules, 1975 and the terms of the contract. The Court clarified that the termination was not discriminatory as retaining juniors did not violate constitutional provisions. Additionally, the termination was found to be based on work and suitability, not punitive in nature, and did not violate Article 311 of the Constitution. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and dismissed the respondent's writ petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184557