<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (9) TMI 152 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184556</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that a return filed under section 139(4) could not be considered as filed within the time allowed under section 139(1) to avoid penalty under section 271(1)(a). Charging interest under section 139(4) did not extend the time for submitting the return, and penalty under section 273(b) did not bar penalty under section 271(1)(a). The appeal was partially allowed, instructing the Income-tax Officer to reassess the penalty amount based on pertinent rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:13:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (9) TMI 152 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184556</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that a return filed under section 139(4) could not be considered as filed within the time allowed under section 139(1) to avoid penalty under section 271(1)(a). Charging interest under section 139(4) did not extend the time for submitting the return, and penalty under section 273(b) did not bar penalty under section 271(1)(a). The appeal was partially allowed, instructing the Income-tax Officer to reassess the penalty amount based on pertinent rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>