https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184555 The court allowed the appeals, set aside the majority judgment of the High Court, and dismissed the writ petition. It ruled that the Judge's resignation was not complete and operative until the future date specified in the resignation letter, and thus, the withdrawal of the resignation before that date was valid. The Union of India had the locus standi to appeal, and the interpretation of Article 217(1) supported the view that a prospective resignation could be withdrawn before it became effective. en-us Wed, 15 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jul 2016 16:06:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184555 The court allowed the appeals, set aside the majority judgment of the High Court, and dismissed the writ petition. It ruled that the Judge's resignation was not complete and operative until the future date specified in the resignation letter, and thus, the withdrawal of the resignation before that date was valid. The Union of India had the locus standi to appeal, and the interpretation of Article 217(1) supported the view that a prospective resignation could be withdrawn before it became effective. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184555