https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184550 The court dismissed the appeal, finding no evidence of mala fides or bad faith in the State Government's actions. The appellant's allegations were deemed vague and lacking necessary details. The court upheld the abolition of the post of Landscape Architect, ruling it justified and not premature. The appellant's reversion to a non-gazetted post was considered as not amounting to termination. The court suggested the government consider a lump sum payment to the appellant for his qualifications and service. en-us Thu, 05 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:05:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184550 The court dismissed the appeal, finding no evidence of mala fides or bad faith in the State Government's actions. The appellant's allegations were deemed vague and lacking necessary details. The court upheld the abolition of the post of Landscape Architect, ruling it justified and not premature. The appellant's reversion to a non-gazetted post was considered as not amounting to termination. The court suggested the government consider a lump sum payment to the appellant for his qualifications and service. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184550