https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184548 The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that there was no violation of Article 311(2) of the Constitution and no malafide intent in the abolition of the post. The appellant's reversion to his original position was deemed lawful, and the decision to discontinue the post was justified by administrative requirements. Despite expressing sympathy for the appellant's circumstances, the court upheld the High Court's judgment, dismissing the appeal without costs. en-us Wed, 02 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:57:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184548 The court dismissed the appeal, ruling that there was no violation of Article 311(2) of the Constitution and no malafide intent in the abolition of the post. The appellant's reversion to his original position was deemed lawful, and the decision to discontinue the post was justified by administrative requirements. Despite expressing sympathy for the appellant's circumstances, the court upheld the High Court's judgment, dismissing the appeal without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184548