<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 762 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184544</link>
    <description>The appeal of the revenue was dismissed as there was no evidence of fraud or deliberate breach of law by the respondent, a professional firm. The respondent acknowledged their service tax liability and complied belatedly due to non-realization of tax from clients. The court found the firm&#039;s conduct indicated a fair intention to comply, and considering their professional nature, imposing a penalty would be unreasonable. The court emphasized that there was no proof of evasion and modified the first appeal order accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:36:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 762 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184544</link>
      <description>The appeal of the revenue was dismissed as there was no evidence of fraud or deliberate breach of law by the respondent, a professional firm. The respondent acknowledged their service tax liability and complied belatedly due to non-realization of tax from clients. The court found the firm&#039;s conduct indicated a fair intention to comply, and considering their professional nature, imposing a penalty would be unreasonable. The court emphasized that there was no proof of evasion and modified the first appeal order accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>