<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 518 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329920</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the re-opening notice for the assessment year 2009-2010 under section 54F of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it was issued beyond the four-year period without any failure to disclose material facts. The Court found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions were based on existing records from the original assessment, and there was no new material warranting the re-opening. As the petitioner had provided necessary details during the initial assessment and the investment in residential plots was accepted in law, the Court set aside the notice and disposed of the matter in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 518 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329920</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the re-opening notice for the assessment year 2009-2010 under section 54F of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it was issued beyond the four-year period without any failure to disclose material facts. The Court found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s conclusions were based on existing records from the original assessment, and there was no new material warranting the re-opening. As the petitioner had provided necessary details during the initial assessment and the investment in residential plots was accepted in law, the Court set aside the notice and disposed of the matter in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>