<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 212 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4124</link>
    <description>The court dismissed all appeals by the Revenue, affirming the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s judgment in favor of the assessee. The primary issue was the interpretation of the proviso to section 147 regarding the reopening of assessments. The court clarified that the proviso does not restrict the main provision and only applies in cases of assessee&#039;s failure, not Assessing Officer&#039;s fault. The court emphasized that deeming provisions apply when there is a failure on the part of the assessee for escaped assessments made at too low a rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 212 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4124</link>
      <description>The court dismissed all appeals by the Revenue, affirming the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s judgment in favor of the assessee. The primary issue was the interpretation of the proviso to section 147 regarding the reopening of assessments. The court clarified that the proviso does not restrict the main provision and only applies in cases of assessee&#039;s failure, not Assessing Officer&#039;s fault. The court emphasized that deeming provisions apply when there is a failure on the part of the assessee for escaped assessments made at too low a rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>