<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1495 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184527</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the appropriation of a refund against confirmed demands without notice. Emphasizing the impermissibility of coercive recovery without notice, the Tribunal highlighted procedural irregularities and the importance of a show cause notice and personal hearing. It questioned the legality of the recovery proceedings, noting that demands become arrears only upon finality. As no confirmed demands existed at the time of the appeal, the appellant was deemed eligible for the full refund amount initially sanctioned. The decision clarified legal principles and granted relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1495 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184527</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the appropriation of a refund against confirmed demands without notice. Emphasizing the impermissibility of coercive recovery without notice, the Tribunal highlighted procedural irregularities and the importance of a show cause notice and personal hearing. It questioned the legality of the recovery proceedings, noting that demands become arrears only upon finality. As no confirmed demands existed at the time of the appeal, the appellant was deemed eligible for the full refund amount initially sanctioned. The decision clarified legal principles and granted relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>