<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1148 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184531</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal. The Tribunal was directed to fix an early hearing date within four weeks based on its convenience, considering the recurring nature of the issue and the potential benefits to multiple appeals from a single disposal. No orders were made regarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 11:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1148 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184531</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order, and remitted the matter back to the Tribunal. The Tribunal was directed to fix an early hearing date within four weeks based on its convenience, considering the recurring nature of the issue and the potential benefits to multiple appeals from a single disposal. No orders were made regarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>