<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 486 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329888</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) has the authority to remand the matter back to the Original Adjudicating Authority for de-novo adjudication. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the Original Adjudicating Authority was directed to follow the directions given in the impugned order and dispose of the matter within 60 days of receiving the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:17:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 486 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329888</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) has the authority to remand the matter back to the Original Adjudicating Authority for de-novo adjudication. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the Original Adjudicating Authority was directed to follow the directions given in the impugned order and dispose of the matter within 60 days of receiving the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>