<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 484 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329886</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision rejecting the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, a merchant-importer accused of mis-declaration in a bill of entry for &quot;High Speed Steel Scrap&quot; Tools. The Tribunal found the valuation dispute was not adequately addressed, with the orders being cryptic and violating natural justice principles. The appellant&#039;s contention of unusable tools was supported by a second valuer&#039;s opinion, leading to the impugned order being overturned. The appellant was granted consequential benefits, and directions were given for the order to be served on the appellant through the jurisdictional Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 484 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329886</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision rejecting the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, a merchant-importer accused of mis-declaration in a bill of entry for &quot;High Speed Steel Scrap&quot; Tools. The Tribunal found the valuation dispute was not adequately addressed, with the orders being cryptic and violating natural justice principles. The appellant&#039;s contention of unusable tools was supported by a second valuer&#039;s opinion, leading to the impugned order being overturned. The appellant was granted consequential benefits, and directions were given for the order to be served on the appellant through the jurisdictional Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>