<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 483 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the matter for further examination by the original authority. The appellant was found entitled to a refund claim under Section 27 of the Customs Act for excess duty paid due to ignorance of a concessional rate of duty notification, within the six-month limitation period. The Tribunal stressed the need to assess unjust enrichment before processing the refund claim, following the Delhi High Court&#039;s ruling that such refunds are permissible even without a formal assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 483 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the matter for further examination by the original authority. The appellant was found entitled to a refund claim under Section 27 of the Customs Act for excess duty paid due to ignorance of a concessional rate of duty notification, within the six-month limitation period. The Tribunal stressed the need to assess unjust enrichment before processing the refund claim, following the Delhi High Court&#039;s ruling that such refunds are permissible even without a formal assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>