https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4120 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and providing relief to the appellants. It held that the duty demand was premature, and the penalty imposition was unjustified due to the validity of the warehousing license until 2009, the goods remaining in the bonded premises, and the automatic extension of the warehousing period as per the Board's Circular. The decision was based on relevant case laws supporting the extension of the warehousing period and non-demand of duty until the expiry of the period. en-us Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4120 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and providing relief to the appellants. It held that the duty demand was premature, and the penalty imposition was unjustified due to the validity of the warehousing license until 2009, the goods remaining in the bonded premises, and the automatic extension of the warehousing period as per the Board's Circular. The decision was based on relevant case laws supporting the extension of the warehousing period and non-demand of duty until the expiry of the period. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4120