<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 480 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329882</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s plea to waive trade tax liability under a settlement scheme for Brick Kiln Season 2014-15. Citing a Full Bench judgment, the court held that once an agreement for tax payment under a composition scheme is binding, it cannot be denied later, regardless of operational challenges. Emphasizing the importance of honoring agreed-upon terms, the court rejected the petitioner&#039;s argument to waive tax due to non-operation of the kiln. The court concluded that the petitioner&#039;s plea was misconceived and upheld the obligation to pay the composition money as agreed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:12:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 480 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329882</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s plea to waive trade tax liability under a settlement scheme for Brick Kiln Season 2014-15. Citing a Full Bench judgment, the court held that once an agreement for tax payment under a composition scheme is binding, it cannot be denied later, regardless of operational challenges. Emphasizing the importance of honoring agreed-upon terms, the court rejected the petitioner&#039;s argument to waive tax due to non-operation of the kiln. The court concluded that the petitioner&#039;s plea was misconceived and upheld the obligation to pay the composition money as agreed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>