<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 475 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329877</link>
    <description>Execution of a recovery certificate under the recovery statute remains within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal and Recovery Officer, and the Company Court cannot interfere with a sale confirmed in that process merely because the debtor-company is in liquidation. The Official Liquidator may be associated with the sale process, but that does not confer supervisory power on the Company Court to cancel, confirm, or re-examine the auction. Once objections are rejected and the sale is confirmed, the aggrieved party must pursue the statutory appeal under the recovery legislation, and a parallel challenge before the Company Court is not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:06:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 475 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329877</link>
      <description>Execution of a recovery certificate under the recovery statute remains within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal and Recovery Officer, and the Company Court cannot interfere with a sale confirmed in that process merely because the debtor-company is in liquidation. The Official Liquidator may be associated with the sale process, but that does not confer supervisory power on the Company Court to cancel, confirm, or re-examine the auction. Once objections are rejected and the sale is confirmed, the aggrieved party must pursue the statutory appeal under the recovery legislation, and a parallel challenge before the Company Court is not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>