https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329876 The court upheld the legality of the ECIR registration under PMLA against the petitioner and his minor children, finding a connection between the petitioner and the proceeds of the crime. The provisional attachment of properties was also upheld due to the petitioner's disproportionate immovable property purchases compared to his declared income. While the notice under Section 8(1) of PMLA was deemed properly served on the petitioner, the improper service of notices to the minor children was acknowledged but not remedied as they did not challenge the procedure. The court dismissed the writ petition, suggesting recourse through the Adjudicating Authority and further legal avenues under PMLA. en-us Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Nov 2016 15:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329876 The court upheld the legality of the ECIR registration under PMLA against the petitioner and his minor children, finding a connection between the petitioner and the proceeds of the crime. The provisional attachment of properties was also upheld due to the petitioner's disproportionate immovable property purchases compared to his declared income. While the notice under Section 8(1) of PMLA was deemed properly served on the petitioner, the improper service of notices to the minor children was acknowledged but not remedied as they did not challenge the procedure. The court dismissed the writ petition, suggesting recourse through the Adjudicating Authority and further legal avenues under PMLA. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329876