<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 108 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4118</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over a refund claim for excess payment due to non-claim of a special duty exemption. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that the non-claim of exemption was a clerical error under Section 154 of the Customs Act and remanded the case for reassessment. The Tribunal disagreed, stating that non-claiming of exemption does not qualify as a clerical error and emphasized the need to challenge the assessment order for a refund claim. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision, allowing the revenue&#039;s appeal and denying the refund claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 108 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4118</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over a refund claim for excess payment due to non-claim of a special duty exemption. The Commissioner (Appeals) held that the non-claim of exemption was a clerical error under Section 154 of the Customs Act and remanded the case for reassessment. The Tribunal disagreed, stating that non-claiming of exemption does not qualify as a clerical error and emphasized the need to challenge the assessment order for a refund claim. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision, allowing the revenue&#039;s appeal and denying the refund claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>