<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 850 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184514</link>
    <description>Incomplete import declaration forms under the U.P. VAT regime can justify seizure and detention when material particulars are left blank. The Court held that Form 38 is a statutory safeguard against evasion and must be completed in all material respects; missing entries on weight, quantity, bill number and date were not treated as immaterial merely because invoices were available. It further held that, at the detention stage, the surrounding facts may support an inference of attempted tax evasion, and the finding of deliberate incompleteness was not shown to be perverse in revision. The seizure, detention and security demand were therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 09:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 850 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184514</link>
      <description>Incomplete import declaration forms under the U.P. VAT regime can justify seizure and detention when material particulars are left blank. The Court held that Form 38 is a statutory safeguard against evasion and must be completed in all material respects; missing entries on weight, quantity, bill number and date were not treated as immaterial merely because invoices were available. It further held that, at the detention stage, the surrounding facts may support an inference of attempted tax evasion, and the finding of deliberate incompleteness was not shown to be perverse in revision. The seizure, detention and security demand were therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184514</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>