<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1201 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184512</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that income from investments in Portfolio Management Scheme (PMS) should be classified as &#039;Capital gain&#039; rather than &#039;Business income.&#039; The Tribunal emphasized that transactions through PMS focused on wealth maximization and investment protection, aligning more with capital gain taxation principles. The decision overturned the initial assessment categorizing the income as business income, with the Tribunal citing relevant precedents to support its conclusion. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the income was reclassified under the &#039;Capital gain&#039; category for tax assessment purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 09:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1201 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184512</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that income from investments in Portfolio Management Scheme (PMS) should be classified as &#039;Capital gain&#039; rather than &#039;Business income.&#039; The Tribunal emphasized that transactions through PMS focused on wealth maximization and investment protection, aligning more with capital gain taxation principles. The decision overturned the initial assessment categorizing the income as business income, with the Tribunal citing relevant precedents to support its conclusion. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the income was reclassified under the &#039;Capital gain&#039; category for tax assessment purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>