<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 827 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184509</link>
    <description>In assessing the rateable value of self-occupied recently constructed premises, the authority must apply the hypothetical tenant test, keep the valuation within the ceiling of standard rent, and consider comparable premises in the same or adjoining locality to avoid irrational disparity between old and new properties. A municipal body cannot decline to follow these legal principles on the ground of administrative inconvenience or lack of machinery to collect comparative material, because the valuation function remains quasi-judicial and must be exercised in accordance with law. The Supreme Court therefore set aside the High Court judgments and remitted the matters for fresh determination of rateable value under the governing principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:17:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 827 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184509</link>
      <description>In assessing the rateable value of self-occupied recently constructed premises, the authority must apply the hypothetical tenant test, keep the valuation within the ceiling of standard rent, and consider comparable premises in the same or adjoining locality to avoid irrational disparity between old and new properties. A municipal body cannot decline to follow these legal principles on the ground of administrative inconvenience or lack of machinery to collect comparative material, because the valuation function remains quasi-judicial and must be exercised in accordance with law. The Supreme Court therefore set aside the High Court judgments and remitted the matters for fresh determination of rateable value under the governing principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>