https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184508 A mortgagee could not resist delivery of possession on the basis of an unproved alleged auction sale, as valid transfer was not established by reliable sale records and the right to retain possession ended once the debt was discharged. An application to recover possession under the special statute was not barred by limitation, because the Act formed a complete code and no limitation period was prescribed for such recovery; adverse possession also failed for want of proof of hostile title to the true owner's knowledge. Mesne profits were upheld as a consequential incident of delivery of possession and could be granted in execution. The appeal therefore failed and delivery of possession with mesne profits was sustained. en-us Fri, 15 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:12:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184508 A mortgagee could not resist delivery of possession on the basis of an unproved alleged auction sale, as valid transfer was not established by reliable sale records and the right to retain possession ended once the debt was discharged. An application to recover possession under the special statute was not barred by limitation, because the Act formed a complete code and no limitation period was prescribed for such recovery; adverse possession also failed for want of proof of hostile title to the true owner's knowledge. Mesne profits were upheld as a consequential incident of delivery of possession and could be granted in execution. The appeal therefore failed and delivery of possession with mesne profits was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 May 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184508