https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184505 In preventive detention, only material truly relevant to the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction must be placed before it; the omission of an administrative order stopping EXIM benefits to the detenu's company did not vitiate detention because it did not show or negate smuggling activity or future propensity. Supply of allegedly illegible documents also did not breach Article 22(5) where the disputed pages were legible or were documents already furnished by the detenu, and he was able to make an effective representation. Delay in communicating rejection of a later reiterative representation did not invalidate detention because the substantive representation had already been considered and rejected. en-us Thu, 02 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:07:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184505 In preventive detention, only material truly relevant to the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction must be placed before it; the omission of an administrative order stopping EXIM benefits to the detenu's company did not vitiate detention because it did not show or negate smuggling activity or future propensity. Supply of allegedly illegible documents also did not breach Article 22(5) where the disputed pages were legible or were documents already furnished by the detenu, and he was able to make an effective representation. Delay in communicating rejection of a later reiterative representation did not invalidate detention because the substantive representation had already been considered and rejected. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 02 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184505