https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184504 Continuous canteen operations for bank staff, supported by the bank's premises, utilities, subsidies, and other infrastructure, were treated as part of the establishment, with the managing arrangement viewed as only a veil between the bank and the workers. On that basis, the canteen workers were regarded as employees of the bank. The closure of the canteen and continuation of a contractor during pendency of the industrial dispute were treated as an unlawful alteration of service conditions, so the relief granted by the Tribunal was sustained and the challenge by the bank failed. en-us Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:40:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184504 Continuous canteen operations for bank staff, supported by the bank's premises, utilities, subsidies, and other infrastructure, were treated as part of the establishment, with the managing arrangement viewed as only a veil between the bank and the workers. On that basis, the canteen workers were regarded as employees of the bank. The closure of the canteen and continuation of a contractor during pendency of the industrial dispute were treated as an unlawful alteration of service conditions, so the relief granted by the Tribunal was sustained and the challenge by the bank failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184504