<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 473 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329875</link>
    <description>Contract carriage operators using vehicles for marriage parties, excursions and group trips were held liable as &quot;tour operators&quot; under the Finance Act, 1994 because the factual record showed they were operating trips and tours through their own staff, including the driver, rather than merely hiring out vehicles. The statutory definition covered persons engaged in operating tours in a tourist vehicle or contract carriage, and the earlier writ judgment had only required proper enquiry into the actual activity. As the authorities&#039; factual conclusion was neither perverse nor illegal, interference was unwarranted and the service tax demand was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 473 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329875</link>
      <description>Contract carriage operators using vehicles for marriage parties, excursions and group trips were held liable as &quot;tour operators&quot; under the Finance Act, 1994 because the factual record showed they were operating trips and tours through their own staff, including the driver, rather than merely hiring out vehicles. The statutory definition covered persons engaged in operating tours in a tourist vehicle or contract carriage, and the earlier writ judgment had only required proper enquiry into the actual activity. As the authorities&#039; factual conclusion was neither perverse nor illegal, interference was unwarranted and the service tax demand was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>