<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 472 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329874</link>
    <description>The High Court held that writ petitions are maintainable against orders passed by Appellate Authorities or the Tribunal on applications for stay or waiver of predeposit, contrary to the Division Bench&#039;s ruling. Exceptional circumstances outlined by the Supreme Court allow for such petitions. The Court emphasized the need for Division Benches to hear these cases to avoid dual remedies. The petitioner&#039;s grievance was upheld as the Tribunal&#039;s order for predeposit did not consider relevant issues. The High Court set aside the order, directing the Tribunal to reconsider the application in line with the law and raised contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 472 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329874</link>
      <description>The High Court held that writ petitions are maintainable against orders passed by Appellate Authorities or the Tribunal on applications for stay or waiver of predeposit, contrary to the Division Bench&#039;s ruling. Exceptional circumstances outlined by the Supreme Court allow for such petitions. The Court emphasized the need for Division Benches to hear these cases to avoid dual remedies. The petitioner&#039;s grievance was upheld as the Tribunal&#039;s order for predeposit did not consider relevant issues. The High Court set aside the order, directing the Tribunal to reconsider the application in line with the law and raised contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>