<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 469 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329871</link>
    <description>Unutilised accumulated CENVAT credit of AED (T &amp; TA) on inputs used in exported goods was held refundable under Rule 5 where the credit was otherwise admissible and its utilisation was restricted by the scheme. The Board&#039;s circular supported the view that such credit could be taken and, if left unutilised on export, was refundable subject to the prescribed conditions and limitations. The claim was therefore found admissible, the rejection was unsustainable, and the refund was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 469 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329871</link>
      <description>Unutilised accumulated CENVAT credit of AED (T &amp; TA) on inputs used in exported goods was held refundable under Rule 5 where the credit was otherwise admissible and its utilisation was restricted by the scheme. The Board&#039;s circular supported the view that such credit could be taken and, if left unutilised on export, was refundable subject to the prescribed conditions and limitations. The claim was therefore found admissible, the rejection was unsustainable, and the refund was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>