<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 468 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329870</link>
    <description>The appellant appealed against the denial of input service credit for various services pre and post 2011. The tribunal found in favor of the appellant, allowing credit on warehouse rent services, project for modification/modernization services, horticulture services, courier services, and transportation services. The tribunal concluded that the appellant is entitled to avail Cenvat credit on the disputed services, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 468 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329870</link>
      <description>The appellant appealed against the denial of input service credit for various services pre and post 2011. The tribunal found in favor of the appellant, allowing credit on warehouse rent services, project for modification/modernization services, horticulture services, courier services, and transportation services. The tribunal concluded that the appellant is entitled to avail Cenvat credit on the disputed services, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>