<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 465 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329867</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s Miscellaneous Application to prevent the auction of confiscated Supari. It found that the Betel nut was not prohibited goods and ordered the provisional release for testing for human consumption. The appellant was permitted to draw samples for testing by the state&#039;s Food &amp;amp; Drugs Administration. The appeal was set for final hearing, and the Registry was directed to list other connected appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:44:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 465 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329867</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s Miscellaneous Application to prevent the auction of confiscated Supari. It found that the Betel nut was not prohibited goods and ordered the provisional release for testing for human consumption. The appellant was permitted to draw samples for testing by the state&#039;s Food &amp;amp; Drugs Administration. The appeal was set for final hearing, and the Registry was directed to list other connected appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>