<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 452 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329854</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate income particulars. Interest income from non-cooperative banks and sales activities were not eligible for deduction under section 80P. The claim of total exemption under section 80P was deemed deliberate, justifying the penalty. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 452 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329854</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate income particulars. Interest income from non-cooperative banks and sales activities were not eligible for deduction under section 80P. The claim of total exemption under section 80P was deemed deliberate, justifying the penalty. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower authorities&#039; decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>