https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184499 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Service Tax liability imposed on services related to commissioning, installation, and erection of gas plant and equipment. The Tribunal relied on Circular No. 79/9/2004-S.T. to determine that these services did not qualify as Consulting Engineer Services during the relevant period. Citing precedents, including CCE v. Gujarat Goldcoin Ceramics Ltd., the Tribunal held that the appellant's services did not fall within the scope of Consulting Engineer Services, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:05:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184499 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Service Tax liability imposed on services related to commissioning, installation, and erection of gas plant and equipment. The Tribunal relied on Circular No. 79/9/2004-S.T. to determine that these services did not qualify as Consulting Engineer Services during the relevant period. Citing precedents, including CCE v. Gujarat Goldcoin Ceramics Ltd., the Tribunal held that the appellant's services did not fall within the scope of Consulting Engineer Services, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184499