<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 441 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329843</link>
    <description>An earlier self-assessment under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act did not, by itself, bar reassessment of the same turnover where the record showed that the turnover had not attained finality. The challenge on that ground therefore failed. However, the reassessment order was unsustainable because no personal hearing was granted before it was passed, despite written objections having been filed. That denial of a reasonable opportunity violated natural justice, so the reassessment order and the consequential penalty notice were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after hearing the dealer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:46:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 441 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329843</link>
      <description>An earlier self-assessment under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act did not, by itself, bar reassessment of the same turnover where the record showed that the turnover had not attained finality. The challenge on that ground therefore failed. However, the reassessment order was unsustainable because no personal hearing was granted before it was passed, despite written objections having been filed. That denial of a reasonable opportunity violated natural justice, so the reassessment order and the consequential penalty notice were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration after hearing the dealer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>