<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 440 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329842</link>
    <description>The court ordered the petitioner, a registered dealer challenging a goods detention notice, to pay a tax amount of Rs. 25,000 for the release of the detained goods. The court directed the petitioner to pay the tax to the respondent and disposed of the writ petition, allowing the release of the goods upon payment. The petitioner was advised of the option to challenge the compounding fee before the competent authority as per legal procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:46:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 440 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329842</link>
      <description>The court ordered the petitioner, a registered dealer challenging a goods detention notice, to pay a tax amount of Rs. 25,000 for the release of the detained goods. The court directed the petitioner to pay the tax to the respondent and disposed of the writ petition, allowing the release of the goods upon payment. The petitioner was advised of the option to challenge the compounding fee before the competent authority as per legal procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>