https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184484 A writ petition was held not maintainable where the petitioner had an alternative and efficacious statutory appeal under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The impugned orders were passed under Section 69, and the Court noted that the dispute involved questions of fact that were better addressed by the appellate authority. The petitioner was therefore required to pursue the appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 62 rather than invoke writ jurisdiction. The petition was rejected for non-availment of the statutory appellate remedy. en-us Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:06:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184484 A writ petition was held not maintainable where the petitioner had an alternative and efficacious statutory appeal under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The impugned orders were passed under Section 69, and the Court noted that the dispute involved questions of fact that were better addressed by the appellate authority. The petitioner was therefore required to pursue the appeal before the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 62 rather than invoke writ jurisdiction. The petition was rejected for non-availment of the statutory appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184484