<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 913 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184485</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a revised assessment order under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, emphasizing the availability of appellate remedy for addressing factual disputes. The court held that the petitioner should pursue the challenge before the appellate authority rather than seeking relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, highlighting the proper legal process for challenging administrative decisions in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 913 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184485</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a revised assessment order under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, emphasizing the availability of appellate remedy for addressing factual disputes. The court held that the petitioner should pursue the challenge before the appellate authority rather than seeking relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, highlighting the proper legal process for challenging administrative decisions in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>