https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184481 An order passed under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was held to be appealable under the statutory appeal mechanism, and the writ petition was not entertained because the petitioner had not first exhausted that efficacious alternate remedy. The Court therefore declined writ jurisdiction on maintainability grounds, while granting liberty to file the statutory appeal within two weeks. The appellate authority was also directed not to insist on a delay application if the appeal is filed on or before the specified date. en-us Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:06:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184481 An order passed under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was held to be appealable under the statutory appeal mechanism, and the writ petition was not entertained because the petitioner had not first exhausted that efficacious alternate remedy. The Court therefore declined writ jurisdiction on maintainability grounds, while granting liberty to file the statutory appeal within two weeks. The appellate authority was also directed not to insist on a delay application if the appeal is filed on or before the specified date. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184481