<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 1130 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184482</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction was treated as unavailable where an effective statutory appeal remedy existed in a tax dispute concerning deduction of discount from taxable turnover. The Court reiterated that writ relief is ordinarily declined in tax matters unless exceptional grounds such as jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, or a credible constitutional challenge are shown. The discount-related issue had already been considered in earlier proceedings and was regarded as having attained finality, so it did not justify reopening the matter. As no sufficient ground was accepted to bypass the appeal remedy, the writ petition was not entertained and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:06:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 1130 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184482</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction was treated as unavailable where an effective statutory appeal remedy existed in a tax dispute concerning deduction of discount from taxable turnover. The Court reiterated that writ relief is ordinarily declined in tax matters unless exceptional grounds such as jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, or a credible constitutional challenge are shown. The discount-related issue had already been considered in earlier proceedings and was regarded as having attained finality, so it did not justify reopening the matter. As no sufficient ground was accepted to bypass the appeal remedy, the writ petition was not entertained and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>