https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184476 Vested appellate rights are substantive and are governed by the law in force when a suit is instituted, unless later legislation expressly or necessarily removes them. Section 602 of the Hyderabad Civil Procedure Code therefore continued to permit a second appeal on facts and law in pending suits, despite the later extension of the more restrictive Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Interference with the finding that Vitha Bai predeceased Rukhma Bai was unwarranted because it rested on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, and such factual findings are ordinarily not disturbed in an Article 136 appeal. The plaintiffs' entitlement to possession remained undisturbed. en-us Mon, 31 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jul 2016 14:11:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184476 Vested appellate rights are substantive and are governed by the law in force when a suit is instituted, unless later legislation expressly or necessarily removes them. Section 602 of the Hyderabad Civil Procedure Code therefore continued to permit a second appeal on facts and law in pending suits, despite the later extension of the more restrictive Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Interference with the finding that Vitha Bai predeceased Rukhma Bai was unwarranted because it rested on appreciation of oral and documentary evidence, and such factual findings are ordinarily not disturbed in an Article 136 appeal. The plaintiffs' entitlement to possession remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184476