https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184475 Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure confines second appeals to substantial questions of law, requires the appellant to state such a question, and obliges the High Court to satisfy itself that the question exists and to formulate it before hearing the appeal. Pure questions of fact and concurrent findings cannot be reopened except within recognised legal exceptions. Where the High Court decided the second appeal without formulating any substantial question of law or hearing the matter on that basis, the statutory procedure was not complied with, so the judgment was liable to be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with Section 100. en-us Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184475 Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure confines second appeals to substantial questions of law, requires the appellant to state such a question, and obliges the High Court to satisfy itself that the question exists and to formulate it before hearing the appeal. Pure questions of fact and concurrent findings cannot be reopened except within recognised legal exceptions. Where the High Court decided the second appeal without formulating any substantial question of law or hearing the matter on that basis, the statutory procedure was not complied with, so the judgment was liable to be set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with Section 100. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184475