https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329821 Imported camera carried by a passenger for another person, and not declared through the green channel, was treated as outside bona fide baggage under the Baggage Rules and not as a bona fide gift or article for the passenger's own use under the Customs Act. On the passenger's own admission that the camera was meant for delivery to someone else in India, the goods were held liable to absolute confiscation. Redemption under section 125 was found impermissible, and the appellate relief was set aside. The objection to maintainability of the revision was rejected because the filing officer was duly authorised. en-us Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:24:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329821 Imported camera carried by a passenger for another person, and not declared through the green channel, was treated as outside bona fide baggage under the Baggage Rules and not as a bona fide gift or article for the passenger's own use under the Customs Act. On the passenger's own admission that the camera was meant for delivery to someone else in India, the goods were held liable to absolute confiscation. Redemption under section 125 was found impermissible, and the appellate relief was set aside. The objection to maintainability of the revision was rejected because the filing officer was duly authorised. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329821