https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329818 The government rejected the revision application as the applicants failed to provide evidence of duty payment on molasses or ENA, did not comply with Drawback Rules, and did not follow procedures for filing supplementary claims. The denial of duty drawback on molasses and appeal rejection were upheld, with principles of natural justice considered followed. The revision application was dismissed for lacking merit. en-us Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329818 The government rejected the revision application as the applicants failed to provide evidence of duty payment on molasses or ENA, did not comply with Drawback Rules, and did not follow procedures for filing supplementary claims. The denial of duty drawback on molasses and appeal rejection were upheld, with principles of natural justice considered followed. The revision application was dismissed for lacking merit. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329818