https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329817 Imported food items that fail mandatory labelling and food-safety requirements may be treated as misbranded or prohibited goods under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Non-compliance with statutory labelling norms supported confiscation, redemption fine and penalty, even though samples were not drawn for analysis, because the food-safety violation was accepted. Given the limited quantity involved and the established breach, no interference with the adjudication was warranted. The appellate order was left undisturbed, and confiscation, redemption fine and penalty remained upheld. en-us Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:24:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329817 Imported food items that fail mandatory labelling and food-safety requirements may be treated as misbranded or prohibited goods under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Non-compliance with statutory labelling norms supported confiscation, redemption fine and penalty, even though samples were not drawn for analysis, because the food-safety violation was accepted. Given the limited quantity involved and the established breach, no interference with the adjudication was warranted. The appellate order was left undisturbed, and confiscation, redemption fine and penalty remained upheld. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329817