<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 570 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184469</link>
    <description>The SC held that guest houses maintained by a company for employees visiting temporarily are not premises &quot;exclusively used as a private residential premises&quot; for tariff purposes under Section 3(1) of the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958. The expression was construed according to its natural and ordinary meaning, requiring private residential use for a sufficiently continued period. The fact that the guest house was not run for profit, or that &quot;private&quot; was opposed to &quot;public&quot;, was treated as irrelevant to classification. Such premises therefore fall outside Category &#039;R&#039; and are subject to the tariff applicable to Category &#039;C&#039;.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2016 12:23:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 570 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184469</link>
      <description>The SC held that guest houses maintained by a company for employees visiting temporarily are not premises &quot;exclusively used as a private residential premises&quot; for tariff purposes under Section 3(1) of the Bombay Electricity Duty Act, 1958. The expression was construed according to its natural and ordinary meaning, requiring private residential use for a sufficiently continued period. The fact that the guest house was not run for profit, or that &quot;private&quot; was opposed to &quot;public&quot;, was treated as irrelevant to classification. Such premises therefore fall outside Category &#039;R&#039; and are subject to the tariff applicable to Category &#039;C&#039;.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>