<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 68 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4101</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, modifying the Tribunal&#039;s order. It held that income exempt from tax below the taxable limit, disclosed by the assessee with tax deducted at the source, cannot be categorized as undisclosed income. The court emphasized the importance of timely disclosure and tax deduction in determining the taxability of income, stating that such income should not be taxed solely based on the timing of return filing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 68 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4101</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, modifying the Tribunal&#039;s order. It held that income exempt from tax below the taxable limit, disclosed by the assessee with tax deducted at the source, cannot be categorized as undisclosed income. The court emphasized the importance of timely disclosure and tax deduction in determining the taxability of income, stating that such income should not be taxed solely based on the timing of return filing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>