<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 46 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4099</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court upheld the Assessee&#039;s entitlement to a deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the conversion of polymer granules into specialized polymer alloys in powder form constituted manufacturing, distinct from mere pulverization. The manufacturing process involved specific technical formulations and resulted in products with unique characteristics for various industrial applications. Citing legal precedents, the Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the complexity and distinctiveness of the manufacturing process, ultimately supporting the Assessee&#039;s claim for the tax benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 46 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4099</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court upheld the Assessee&#039;s entitlement to a deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the conversion of polymer granules into specialized polymer alloys in powder form constituted manufacturing, distinct from mere pulverization. The manufacturing process involved specific technical formulations and resulted in products with unique characteristics for various industrial applications. Citing legal precedents, the Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the complexity and distinctiveness of the manufacturing process, ultimately supporting the Assessee&#039;s claim for the tax benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>