https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184461 In preventive detention, approval is not invalid merely because the grounds for the detenu and his brother were identical, where the approving authority had the brother's grounds before it and could be taken to have considered the relevant material; this challenge failed. However, Article 22(5) requires supply not only of the grounds of detention but also of the documents referred to and relied upon in those grounds. Failure to furnish those documents is a serious breach of the constitutional safeguard and vitiates continued detention; the detention order was sustained on the first ground, but the continued detention became unlawful and release followed. en-us Fri, 06 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jul 2016 11:35:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184461 In preventive detention, approval is not invalid merely because the grounds for the detenu and his brother were identical, where the approving authority had the brother's grounds before it and could be taken to have considered the relevant material; this challenge failed. However, Article 22(5) requires supply not only of the grounds of detention but also of the documents referred to and relied upon in those grounds. Failure to furnish those documents is a serious breach of the constitutional safeguard and vitiates continued detention; the detention order was sustained on the first ground, but the continued detention became unlawful and release followed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184461