<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 100 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4098</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the Miscellaneous Petition, as it found that the additional ground regarding Section 80IA&#039;s deduction was not raised or considered during the appeal process. The Court clarified that if the revenue desired to challenge the allowability of Section 80IA, they were at liberty to file a separate appeal on the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 100 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4098</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the Miscellaneous Petition, as it found that the additional ground regarding Section 80IA&#039;s deduction was not raised or considered during the appeal process. The Court clarified that if the revenue desired to challenge the allowability of Section 80IA, they were at liberty to file a separate appeal on the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>