<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1038 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184460</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision to classify the additional quota of free sale of sugar as a capital receipt, considering it part of a loan repayment scheme for expanding the industrial undertaking. The Court dismissed the appeal, concluding that the receipt in question constituted a capital receipt. Additionally, the Court upheld the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under rule 6B of Rs. 17,556, citing previous judgments and finding no grounds to challenge their applicability. Consequently, the appeal on this issue was also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2016 11:28:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1038 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184460</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the tribunal&#039;s decision to classify the additional quota of free sale of sugar as a capital receipt, considering it part of a loan repayment scheme for expanding the industrial undertaking. The Court dismissed the appeal, concluding that the receipt in question constituted a capital receipt. Additionally, the Court upheld the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under rule 6B of Rs. 17,556, citing previous judgments and finding no grounds to challenge their applicability. Consequently, the appeal on this issue was also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>