<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 382 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside and remanding specific issues back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration while upholding other disallowances related to Income Tax Act sections 40A(3) and 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal also upheld the disallowance of 30% of clearing and forwarding charges. The general ground raised by the assessee was dismissed as infructuous. The order was pronounced on 3rd June 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2016 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 382 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside and remanding specific issues back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration while upholding other disallowances related to Income Tax Act sections 40A(3) and 40(a)(ia). The Tribunal also upheld the disallowance of 30% of clearing and forwarding charges. The general ground raised by the assessee was dismissed as infructuous. The order was pronounced on 3rd June 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>