https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184458 In preventive detention, Article 22(5) of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act require the detaining authority to communicate not only the formal ground of detention but also all basic facts and material particulars forming the real factual basis of its satisfaction, unless withheld on public interest grounds. The material supplied to the detenu omitted vital particulars from the history sheet and FIR, including the nature, extent, and surrounding circumstances of the alleged acts. That truncation prevented an effective representation, so the detention order was vitiated and illegal. en-us Thu, 12 Sep 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jul 2016 11:08:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184458 In preventive detention, Article 22(5) of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Maintenance of Internal Security Act require the detaining authority to communicate not only the formal ground of detention but also all basic facts and material particulars forming the real factual basis of its satisfaction, unless withheld on public interest grounds. The material supplied to the detenu omitted vital particulars from the history sheet and FIR, including the nature, extent, and surrounding circumstances of the alleged acts. That truncation prevented an effective representation, so the detention order was vitiated and illegal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 12 Sep 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184458